I just read an article questioning the effects of aerial
attacks on fires and whether or not they work. That concern is nothing new.
Dropping slurry on fires has often been the target of public officials
disputing the cost, danger and effectiveness of this form of firefighting.
Slurry is composed of mainly water and fertilizer: water to
cool down flames, and fertilizer to encourage regrowth. The problem is slurry
alone does not put the fire out. By the time the liquid filters through tree
canopies, all you get is a fine mist with minimal coverage. Actually, the
intent is to cool down the flames enough that ground crews can move in closer
and build line, a cleared area to prevent the fire from advancing. Is it worth
the expense? Many say it is not. However, what is interesting is that even
though it is not all that effective, every year thousands of gallons of the
pink mixture are dropped on wildland fires all over the Country.
So why do fire officials continue to pour millions of
dollars into aerial firefighting? Turns out it’s more for the news media and
the public outcry than anything else.
Take your average forest fire. News reporters are not
allowed to be any closer than fire camp, and sometimes not even that close.
This means no spectacular photos to plaster on the TV or newspapers. Add a
dramatic slurry drop, however, and bingo! You’ve got some pretty dramatic shots
that sell papers and glue people to their televisions.
The other interesting phenomenon is that the general public
doesn’t feel like a fire is being fought aggressively enough if they can’t see
any obvious action. Aerial firefighting provides a sense of security to people,
that something is being done to protect their homes, businesses and forest.
Aerial firefighting is extremely dangerous not only to
ground crews below, but to the brave pilots that fly in hazardous conditions.
Steep terrain, unpredictable wind shifts and fire generated weather, all make
this type of firefighting one of the most dangerous kinds of flying a pilot
could face.
Will aerial slurry drops end in the near future? It’s hard
to say. What’s scary is that it might take a disastrous loss of life before
changes take place. The deaths of the Granite Mountain 19 shook Forest Service
policies to the core, and not only is the effectiveness of the fire shelter
being revisited, but so is training and procedures previously thought to be
adequate.
The take-away here, at least for folks worried that
government agencies aren’t fighting fires aggressively enough, is that just
because you don’t see planes dropping slurry, it doesn’t mean nothing is being
done.
No comments:
Post a Comment